Special Forces Unconventional Warfare Operations



Unconventional warfare (abbreviated UW) is the opposite of conventional warfare. Where conventional warfare is used to reduce the opponent's military capability, unconventional warfare is an attempt to achieve military victory through acquiescence, capitulation, orclandestine support for one side of an existing conflict.
On the surface, UW contrasts with conventional warfare in that forces or objectives are covert or not well-defined, tactics and weapons intensify environments of subversion or intimidation, and the general or long-term goals are coercive or subversive to a political body.




FM 3-05.201
Special Forces Unconventional Warfare Operations
APRIL 2003
DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Distribution authorized to U.S. Government agencies only to protect technical or operational information from automatic dissemination under the International Exchange Program or by other means. This determination was made on 15 March 2003. Other requests for this document must be referred to Commander, United States Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School, ATTN: AOJK-DT-SFD, Fort Bragg, North Carolina 28310-5000.
DESTRUCTION NOTICE: Destroy by any method that must prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document.
Headquarters, Department of the Army


FM 3-05.201 Field Manual HEADQUARTERS No. 3-05.201 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Washington, DC, 30 April 2003
Special Forces Unconventional Warfare Operations
Contents
Page
PREFACE ..................................................................................................................iv Chapter 1 OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................1-1 Unconventional Warfare Aspects............................................................................1-1 Resistance and Insurgency ..................................................................................... 1-3 Dynamics of Insurgencies ....................................................................................... 1-4 United States Sponsorship....................................................................................1-11 Information Operations in UW ...............................................................................1-18 Psychological Operations in UW...........................................................................1-19 Civil-Military Operations in UW..............................................................................1-20 Special Operations Imperatives ............................................................................1-21
Chapter 2 PREMISSION ACTIVITIES.....................................................................................2-1 Mission Analysis ...................................................................................................... 2-1 Procedures .............................................................................................................. 2-2 Products .................................................................................................................. 2-5 Staff Activities ..........................................................................................................2-7 Subordinate Operational Elements .........................................................................2-9 Mission Planning ...................................................................................................2-12 Deliberate Planning Process ................................................................................. 2-12 Feasibility Assessment Process............................................................................2-14
DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Distribution authorized to U.S. Government agencies only to protect technical or operational information from automatic dissemination under the International Exchange Program or by other means. This determination was made on 15 March 2003. Other requests for this document must be referred to Commander, United States Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School, ATTN: AOJK-DT-SFD, Fort Bragg, North Carolina 28310-5000.
DESTRUCTION NOTICE: Destroy by any method that must prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document.
i


FM 3-05.201
Page
Postfeasibility Assessment Activities .................................................................... 2-16 Mission Preparation .............................................................................................. 2-22 Premission Training .............................................................................................. 2-23 Intelligence ............................................................................................................ 2-23 Personnel .............................................................................................................. 2-24 Logistics and Communications ............................................................................. 2-24 Preemployment Preparation ................................................................................. 2-25 Time-Sensitive (Crisis-Action) Planning Process ................................................. 2-25 Emerging Missions................................................................................................ 2-25 Detailed Mission Preparations .............................................................................. 2-26
Chapter 3 EMPLOYMENT....................................................................................................... 3-1 Infiltration................................................................................................................. 3-1 Area Assessment.................................................................................................... 3-1 Development of the JSOA ...................................................................................... 3-3 Guerrilla Bases ..................................................................................................... 3-10 Development of the Resistance Organization ...................................................... 3-15 Elements of the Resistance .................................................................................. 3-18 Training the Resistance Organization................................................................... 3-34 Training the Guerrilla Force .................................................................................. 3-35 Training Staff and Auxiliary or Underground Personnel ....................................... 3-38 Combat Employment ............................................................................................ 3-43 Defensive Operations ........................................................................................... 3-48 Offensive Operations ............................................................................................ 3-48 Raids ..................................................................................................................... 3-49 Battalion (Large) Raids ......................................................................................... 3-56 Ambushes ............................................................................................................. 3-58 Categories of Ambushes....................................................................................... 3-60 Support and Sustainment ..................................................................................... 3-88 Indicators of Counterguerrilla Operations............................................................. 3-89
Chapter 4 POSTMISSION ACTIVITIES.................................................................................. 4-1 Transition ................................................................................................................ 4-1 Demobilization......................................................................................................... 4-2 Dangers of Demobilization...................................................................................... 4-5
ii


FM 3-05.201
Page
Appendix A UNCONVENTIONAL WARFARE IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT......................A-1 Appendix B COMMUNICATIONS...............................................................................................B-1 Appendix C MEDICAL ASPECTS............................................................................................. C-1 Appendix D LEGAL PRINCIPLES............................................................................................. D-1 Appendix E LOGISTICS CONSIDERATIONS ...........................................................................E-1 Appendix F INFILTRATION........................................................................................................F-1 Appendix G SPECIAL FORCES AREA ASSESSMENT........................................................... G-1 Appendix H AREA STUDY OUTLINE FORMAT....................................................................... H-1 Appendix I ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ........................................................................I-1 Appendix J EXAMPLE OF TRAINING PROGRAM OF INSTRUCTION
FOR RESISTANCE FORCES................................................................................. J-1 Appendix K SPECIAL FORCES CACHING...............................................................................K-1 Appendix L LINKUP OPERATIONS ..........................................................................................L-1 Appendix M DEMOBILIZATION OF GUERRILLA FORCES....................................................M-1 GLOSSARY ................................................................................................Glossary-1 BIBLIOGRAPHY...................................................................................Bibliography-1 INDEX............................................................................................................... Index-1
iii


Preface
Field manual (FM) 3-05.201 provides the doctrinal basis for the conduct of unconventional warfare (UW) missions across the operational continuum. It continues the doctrinal education process that begins with Joint Publications (JPs) 3-05, Doctrine for Joint Special Operations; 3-05.1, Joint Tactics, Techniques, and P r
ocedures for Joint Special Operations Task Force Operations; 3-05.5, Joint Special Operations Targeting and Mission Planning P r
ocedures; and FMs 100-25, Doctrine for Army Special Operations Forces, and 3-05.20, Special Forces Operations. This manual informs and guides Special Forces (SF) commanders, staffs, and operational personnel primarily at battalion and lower echelons (Special Forces operational detachments [SFODs] A, B, and C) in their planning for and conduct of UW.
This manual provides historical examples to highlight key points throughout the text. It offers tactics, techniques, procedures, and references to support future SF operations. It also provides general UW guidance, mission procedures, and information ordered chronologically from receipt of the unit mission letter through postmission activities.
Users of this manual should adapt its content to meet their situation and mission requirements. The SFODs use the mission, enemy, terrain and weather, troops and support available—time available and civil considerations (METT-TC) analysis system.
Examples of specific UW techniques and procedures are provided in the appendixes. The appendixes let the users of this manual review the basics of UW mission performance from beginning to end. For users interested only in the details of specific techniques, the appendixes provide reference material keyed to the generic activities in the text.
Commanders and trainers should use this information and other related manuals to plan and conduct rehearsals of mission-specific training. They should also use command guidance and the Army Training and Evaluation Program (ARTEP). The key to assuring success is planning UW-related training before being employed with a specific UW mission.
The proponent of this manual is the United States Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School (USAJFKSWCS). Submit comments and recommended changes to Commander, USAJFKSWCS, ATTN: AOJK-DT-SFD, Fort Bragg, NC 28310-5000.
Unless this publication states otherwise, masculine nouns and pronouns do not refer exclusively to men.
iv


Chapter 1
Overview
FM 3-05.20 defines UW as a broad spectrum of military and paramilitary operations, predominantly conducted through, with, or by indigenous or surrogate forces organized, trained, equipped, supported, and directed in varying degrees by an external source. UW includes, but is not limited to, guerrilla warfare (GW), sabotage, subversion, intelligence activities, and unconventional assisted recovery (UAR).
UNCONVENTIONAL WARFARE ASPECTS
1-1. UW also includes interrelated aspects that may be prosecuted singly or collectively by predominantly indigenous or surrogate personnel. An external source usually supports and directs these personnel in varying degrees during all conditions of war or peace. The intent of United States (U.S.) UW operations is to exploit a hostile power’s political, military, economic, and psychological vulnerability by developing and sustaining resistance forces to accomplish U.S. strategic objectives.
1-2. Regardless of whether UW objectives are strategic or operational, the nature of resistance and the fundamental tactics and techniques of UW operations remain unchanged. UW includes the following interrelated activities.
1-3. Guerrilla warfare consists of military and paramilitary operations conducted by irregular, predominantly indigenous forces against superior forces in enemy-held or hostile territory. It is the overt military aspect of an insurgency.
1-4. Sabotage is an act or acts with intent to injure or obstruct the national defense of a nation by willfully damaging or destroying any national defense or war materiel, premises, or utilities, including human and natural resources. It may also refer to actions taken to injure or obstruct the military capability of an occupying power. Sabotage may be the most effective or the only means of attacking specific targets beyond the capabilities of conventional weapon systems. Sabotage selectively disrupts, destroys, or neutralizes hostile capabilities with a minimum of manpower and material resources. SF conducts sabotage unilaterally through indigenous or surrogate personnel. Sabotage is also a form of effects-based targeting performed by SF personnel. FM 3-05.220, (S) Special Forces Advanced Special Operations (U), Volumes I and II, provides detailed information on sabotage.
1-5. Subversion is any action designed to undermine the military, economic, psychological, or political strength or morale of a regime. All elements of the resistance organization contribute to the subversive effort, but the clandestine nature of subversion dictates that the underground will do the
1-1


FM 3-05.201
bulk of the activity. Subversion is a form of effects-based targeting on human terrain.
1-6. Effective SF targeting demands accurate, timely, and well-organized intelligence. SF personnel must develop good intelligence skills for overt collection, tactical reconnaissance, and the assembly of available intelligence for mission planning packets. Sound target analysis uses the criticality, accessibility, recuperability, vulnerability, effect, recognizability (CARVER) matrix; provides options to planners; satisfies statements of operational requirements (SOR); meets the commander’s objectives; and reduces the risk to operators. FM 100-25 provides more detailed information on targeting.
1-7. Intelligence activities assess areas of interest ranging from political and military personalities to the military capabilities of friendly and enemy forces. SF must perform intelligence activities ranging from developing information critical to planning and conducting operations, sustaining and protecting themselves and the UW force, to assessing the capabilities and intentions of indigenous and coalition forces. These activities may be unilateral or conducted through surrogates. SF intelligence activities may require coordination with other government agencies (OGAs) and may involve national-level oversight.
1-8. Unconventional assisted recovery is a subset of nonconventional assisted recovery (NAR) and is conducted by special operations forces (SOF) (Department of Defense [DOD] Directive 2310.2). UW forces conduct UAR operations to seek out, contact, authenticate, and support military and other selected personnel as they move from an enemy-held, hostile, or sensitive area to areas under friendly control. UAR includes operating unconventional assisted recovery mechanisms (UARMs) and unconventional assisted recovery teams (UARTs). The UARM refers to an entity, group of entities, or organizations within enemy-held territory that operate in a clandestine or covert manner to return designated personnel to friendly control and most often consists of established indigenous or surrogate infrastructures. UARTs consist primarily of SOF personnel directed to service existing designated areas of recovery (DARs) or selected areas for evasion (SAFEs) to recover evaders.
1-9. UW has taken on new significance for several reasons. Historically, SF units have focused on UW as a part of general war. Now, the U.S. policy of supporting selected resistance movements requires SF to focus on UW during conflicts short of war. Also, global urbanization provides for a shift in emphasis from rural guerrilla warfare to all aspects of clandestine resistance including urban and border operations. Training and support for these operations may come from the joint special operations area (JSOA) or from an external training or support site. Some scenarios may dictate a traditional role reversal—the urban guerrilla may conduct most of the operations while supported by the rural guerrilla.
1-10. UW is the most challenging of SF missions because it involves protracted operations with joint forces, allied forces, indigenous or surrogate forces, U.S. agencies, or elements of all of these entities. UW involves detailed, centralized planning and coordination from the SFODA through the Secretary of Defense, and ultimately, decentralized execution. UW requires
1-2

 


FM 3-05.201
proficiency in other SF principal missions (foreign internal defense [FID], direct action [DA], and special reconnaissance [SR]) since, once deployed, the UW mission may include portions of those missions. Before the conduct of SF UW operations, a resistance potential should exist. SF personnel do not create this resistance potential. It is already present and has usually developed into a resistance movement or an organized effort by some portion of the civil population to resist the regime.
1-11. When UW operations support conventional military operations, the focus shifts to primarily military objectives. When a conventional force is committed and its area of interest nears the JSOA, resistance operations may expand to help the tactical commander. In addition, there are times (Operation ENDURING FREEDOM) when the introduction of conventional forces does not take the main effort away from unconventional operations; in fact, the conventional forces may support the unconventional forces. UW operations can—
• Delay and disrupt hostile military operations.
• Interdict lines of communication.
• Deny the hostile power unrestricted use of key areas.
• Divert the hostile power’s attention and resources from the main battle area.
• Interdict hostile warfighting capabilities.
RESISTANCE AND INSURGENCY
1-12. A government’s inability or unwillingness to meet the legitimate needs of its people may cause widespread frustration and dissatisfaction. People may lose their faith and confidence because the government lacks legitimacy. They may also simply recognize that the government is incapable of effectively providing internal security and development.
1-13. Resistance may be either nonviolent or violent. Nonviolent resistance involves acts such as ostracism, tax evasion, boycotts, strikes, or other types of civil disobedience. Violent resistance includes sabotage, subversion, and guerrilla warfare. People usually resist nonviolently at first. However, they may willingly take up violent resistance if a subversive cadre provides them with a cause they perceive to be both worthy and achievable. If the sociopolitical conditions are oppressive enough, resistance may develop into an organized resistance movement.
1-14. A resistance movement is an organized effort by some portion of the civil population of a country to oppose or overthrow the established government or cause withdrawal of an occupying power. The center of gravity in any resistance movement is the people’s will to resist. The people bear the brunt of the established authority’s retaliatory measures. Although armed resistance may be stability operations and support operations from the U.S. perspective, it is total war for those who take up arms.
1-15. An insurgency is an organized resistance movement that uses subversion, sabotage, and armed conflict to achieve its aims. It is a protracted politico-military struggle designed to weaken government control and legitimacy while increasing insurgent control and legitimacy—the
1-3


FM 3-05.201
central issues in an insurgency. Each insurgency has its own unique characteristics based on its strategic objectives, its operational environment, and available resources. Insurgencies normally seek to overthrow the existing social order and reallocate power within the country. They may also seek to—
• Overthrow an established government without a follow-on social revolution.
• Establish an autonomous national territory within the borders of a state.
• Cause the withdrawal of an occupying power.
• Extract political concessions that are unattainable through less violent means.
1-16. The structure of a revolutionary movement can be compared to a pyramidal iceberg, the bulk of which lies submerged with only its peak visible. In building a resistance structure, insurgent leaders give principal attention to the development of a support infrastructure—a task done by specially trained personnel. The resistance cadre organizes the support infrastructure, which in turn supports the guerrillas. This infrastructure works among the citizens in rural villages, towns, and urban cities; within the military, police, and administrative apparatus of government; and among labor groups and students.
DYNAMICS OF INSURGENCIES
1-17. Insurgencies arise when the government is unable or unwilling to address the demands of important social groups. These groups band together and begin to use violence to change the government’s position. Insurgencies are often a coalition of different forces united by their common hostility for the government. To be successful, an insurgency must develop unifying leadership, doctrine, organization, and strategy. Only the seeds of these elements exist when an insurgency begins. The insurgents must continually nurture and provide the necessary care if the insurgency is to mature and succeed. Insurgencies succeed by mobilizing human and materiel resources to provide both active and passive support for their programs, operations, and goals. Mobilization produces workers and fighters, raises funds, and gets the necessary weapons, equipment, and supplies. Mobilization grows out of intense popular dissatisfaction with existing political and social conditions. In an insurgency, the active supporters consider these conditions intolerable. The insurgent leadership articulates the dissatisfaction of the people, places the blame on government, and offers an alternative. The insurgent leadership then provides organizational and managerial skills to transform disaffected people into an effective force for political action. Ultimately, the insurgents need the active support of most of the politically active people and the passive support of the majority.
1-18. A successful insurgency is the most important political power in a newly liberated country. Guerrillas, existing and fighting under conditions of great hardship, develop extremist attitudes and become very jealous of their prerogatives to determine the postwar complexion of their country. These attitudes may make it difficult or impossible to establish a government
1-4


FM 3-05.201
sympathetic to U.S. national interests. However, a nation that sponsors a successful insurgency generally has a political advantage at the close of hostilities.
1-19. There are seven dynamics that are common to most insurgencies. These dynamics provide a framework for analysis that can reveal the insurgency’s strengths and weaknesses. Although the analyst can examine the following dynamics separately, he must study their interaction to fully understand the insurgency.
LEADERSHIP
1-20. Insurgency is not simply random political violence; it is directed and focused political violence. It requires leadership to provide vision, direction, guidance, coordination, and organizational coherence. The insurgency leaders must make their cause known to the people and gain popular support. Their key tasks are to break the ties between the people and the government, and to establish credibility for their movement. The leaders must replace the government’s legitimacy with that of their own. Their education, background, family, social connections, and experiences shape how they think and how they will fulfill their goals. These factors also help shape their approach to problem solving.
1-21. Leadership is a function of both organization and personality. Some organizations deemphasize individual personalities and provide for redundancy and replacement in decision making. These mechanisms produce collective power and do not depend on specific leaders or personalities to be effective. They are easier to penetrate but more resilient to change. Other organizations may depend on a charismatic personality to provide cohesion, motivation, and a focal point for the movement. Organizations led in this way can produce decisions and begin new actions rapidly, but are vulnerable to disruptions if key personalities are removed or co-opted by the enemy.
IDEOLOGY
1-22. To win, the insurgents must have a program that explains what is wrong with society and justifies its actions. They must promise great improvements after the government is overthrown. The insurgency accomplishes this goal through ideology. Ideology guides the insurgents in offering society a goal. The insurgents often express this goal in simple terms for ease of focus. The insurgents’ plans must be vague enough for broad appeal and specific enough to address important issues.
1-23. The ideology of groups within the movement may suggest differing views of strategic objectives. Groups may have ideological conflicts that need to be resolved before an opponent can capitalize on them. Ideology may suggest probable goals and tactics. It greatly influences the insurgent’s perception of his environment. This perception of the environment in turn shapes the movement’s organization and operational methods.
1-5



List of conflicts in Central America

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Guatemala[edit]

[hide]DateEventModern department (or Mexican state)
FebruaryFebruary – March 1524Spanish defeat the K'iche'Retalhuleu, Suchitepéquez, Quetzaltenango, Totonicapán and El Quiché
8 February 1524Battle of Zapotitlán, Spanish victory over the K'iche'Suchitepéquez
12 February 1524First battle of Quetzaltenango results in the death of the K'iche' lord Tecun UmanQuetzaltenango
18 February 1524Second battle of QuetzaltenangoQuetzaltenango
March 1524Spanish under Pedro de Alvarado raze Q'umarkaj, capital of the K'iche'El Quiché
14 April 1524Spanish enter Iximche and ally themselves with the KaqchikelChimaltenango
18 April 1524Spanish defeat the Tz'utujil in battle on the shores of Lake AtitlánSololá
9 May 1524Pedro de Alvarado defeats the Pipil of Panacal or Panacaltepeque near IzcuintepequeEscuintla
26 May 1524Pedro de Alvarado defeats the Xinca of AtiquipaqueSanta Rosa
27 July 1524Iximche declared first colonial capital of GuatemalaChimaltenango
28 August 1524Kaqchikel abandon Iximche and break allianceChimaltenango
7 September 1524Spanish declare war on the KaqchikelChimaltenango
1525The Poqomam capital falls to Pedro de AlvaradoGuatemala
13 March 1525Hernán Cortés arrives at Lake Petén ItzáPetén
October 1525Zaculeu, capital of the Mam, surrenders to Gonzalo de Alvarado y Contreras after a lengthy siegeHuehuetenango
1526Chajoma rebel against the SpanishGuatemala
1526Acasaguastlán given in encomienda to Diego SalvatierraEl Progreso
1526Spanish captains sent by Alvarado conquer ChiquimulaChiquimula
9 February 1526Spanish deserters burn IximcheChimaltenango
1527Spanish abandon their capital at Tecpán GuatemalaChimaltenango
1529San Mateo Ixtatán given in encomienda to Gonzalo de OvalleHuehuetenango
September 1529Spanish routed at UspantánEl Quiché
April 1530Rebellion in Chiquimula put downChiquimula
9 May 1530Kaqchikel surrender to the SpanishSacatepéquez
December 1530Ixil and Uspantek surrender to the SpanishEl Quiché
April 1533Juan de León y Cardona founds San Marcos and San Pedro SacatepéquezSan Marcos
1543Foundation of CobánAlta Verapaz
1549First reductions of the Chuj and Q'anjob'alHuehuetenango
1551Corregimiento of San Cristóbal Acasaguastlán establishedEl Progreso, Zacapa and Baja Verapaz
1555Lowland Maya kill Francisco de VicoAlta Verapaz
1560Reduction of Topiltepeque and Lakandon Ch'olAlta Verapaz
1618Franciscan missionaries arrive at Nojpetén, capital of the ItzáPetén
1619Further missionary expeditions to NojpeténPetén
1684Reduction of San Mateo Ixtatán and Santa EulaliaHuehuetenango
29 January 1686Melchor Rodríguez Mazariegos leaves Huehuetenango, leading an expedition against the LacandónHuehuetenango
1695Franciscan friar Andrés de Avendaño attempts to convert the ItzáPetén
28 February 1695Spanish expeditions leave simultaneously from Cobán, San Mateo Ixtatán and Ocosingo against the LacandónAlta Verapaz, Huehuetenango and Chiapas
1696Andrés de Avendaño forced to flee NojpeténPetén
13 March 1697Nojpetén falls to the Spanish after a fierce battlePetén

Nicaragua[edit]

El Salvador[edit]

Honduras[edit]

  • 1960 — 1996 Central American crisis
    • 1982 — 1986 Battalion 3-16 was responsible for the kidnapping, torture, disappearance and murder of at least 184 Honduran students, professors, journalists, human rights activists and others

Panama[edit]

Belize[edit]







List of conflicts in South America

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a list of armed conflicts in South America.


Development of Spanish American Independence
  Government under traditional Spanish law
  Loyal to Supreme Central Junta or Cortes
  American junta or insurrection movement
  Independent state declared or established
  Height of French control of the Peninsula
Thousand Days War1891 Chilean Civil WarWar of the PacificConquest of the DesertParaguayan WarChincha Islands WarUruguayan WarOccupation of AraucaníaColombian Civil War (1860–1862)Federal WarPlatine WarRevolution of 1851Uruguayan Civil WarWar of the ConfederationWar of the RagamuffinsChilean Civil War of 1829Gran Colombia – Peru WarCisplatine WarBrazilian IndependenceVenezuelan War of IndependenceChilean War of IndependenceArgentine War of IndependencePeruvian War of Independence
Cenepa WarFalklands WarInternal conflict in PeruColombian Armed ConflictLa ViolenciaParaguayan Civil WarEcuadorian-Peruvian WarChaco WarColombia-Peru WarContestado WarThousand Days WarCold WarWWIIWWI

Peru[edit]


The area of the Chavín culture, as well as areas the Chavín culture influenced.

A map of the extent of the Wari Empire

A map of the extent of the Kingdom of Cuzco in 1438

A map of the extent of the Kingdom of Cuzco in 1463
  • circa 1472 C.E. — circa 1493 C.E. Topa Inca Yupanqui, the tenth Sapa Inca of the Inca Empire, extended the realm northward along the Andes through modernEcuador, and developed a special fondness for the city of Quito, which he rebuilt with architects from Cuzco. During this time his father Pachacuti reorganized theKingdom of Cuzco into the Tahuantinsuyu, the "four provinces". He led extensive military conquests to extend the Inca Empire across much of South America, within the boundaries of the nations which are today called PeruBoliviaChile, and Argentina. He became Inca in his turn upon his father's death in 1471, ruling until his own death in 1493. He conquered Chimor, which occupied the northern coast of what is now Peru, the largest remaining rival to the Incas.

A map of the extent of the Kingdom of Cuzco in 1493

A map of the Inca Empire at its greatest extent

Chile[edit]

Bolivia[edit]

Ecuador[edit]

Argentina[edit]

Colombia[edit]

Brazil[edit]

French Guiana[edit]

Venezuela[edit]

Paraguay[edit]

Uruguay[edit]




Northern America[edit]

Canada[edit]

United States[edit]


Territorial evolution of North America of non-native nation states from 1750 to 2008.

Comentários

Postagens mais visitadas deste blog